50. See General Observations: Charge of our response to the commentator who did not accept our load calculations. Staff: all workers entitled to benefits who have regular hours of 17.5 hours/week or more and who are not covered by a collective agreement. Post-docctor recruitment practices are described in the post-doc manual. The faculty should refer to the statutes of its membership in the primary school for consultation. The final rule recognizes that the satisfaction of the “reasonable” standard must be determined by the examination of all relevant facts and circumstances and otherwise maintains the requirement in the NPRM that employers cannot apply, require or acquire genetic information through health or genetic services that if these services, including the acquisition of genetic information, are part of these services, are reasonably designed to promote health or prevent disease. As stated in the NPRM, the program must have an adequate chance to improve the health of participants or prevent disease, and should not be overly distressing, be an excuse for violating Title II of GINA or other laws prohibiting discrimination in the workplace or in the method chosen to promote health or prevent disease. The examples presented in the preamble to the proposed rule should simply illustrate how this standard works. In agreement with several comments on one of these examples, we note that programs consisting of measuring, testing, screening or collecting health information, without providing results, follow-up information or advice on improving the health of the participant, are not reasonably designed to promote health or prevent disease, unless the information collected is actually used to design a program that meets at least one part of the conditions identified. In addition, we would consider that a program is not adequately designed to promote health or prevent disease if, as a precondition for obtaining a reward, it requires excessively strenuous time to participate, requires intrusive procedures or entails considerable costs associated with medical examinations for staff. Nor would we consider a program to be reasonably designed to promote health or prevent disease, if it exists only to cover costs, to transfer targeted employees on the basis of their health, or if the employer only had the program to collect data or to try to determine its future health costs. In addition, an employer-sponsored wellness program is not reasonably designed under these rules when it penalizes a worker because the manifestation of an illness or disorder by a spouse prevents or prevents the spouse from participating in a certain health development or obtaining a specific health outcome.
For example, an employer should not deny a worker an incentive to participate in an employer-sponsored welfare program, since the worker`s spouse has blood pressure, cholesterol or blood sugar levels that the employer deems too high. (iv) However, a covered company may not refuse to participate in an employer-sponsored welfare program or induce a worker to: the worker`s spouse or other dependant in exchange for an agreement authorizing the sale, the exchange, disclosure, disclosure or disclosure of genetic information, including information relating to the printed home page 31159 of a worker`s illness or family disturbance (except to the extent permitted to the extent permitted by paragraph b) (2) (i) (i) of this section or, in other ways, on the protection of workers` protection. The proposed rule estimated the cost of training using salary data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which indicated an average salary of $49.41 per hour for human resource management professionals.  Although the commentator claims that